Romney Takes Tough Stance on Iran

Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney has said that he would use a "blockade or bombardment" to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons. This came as President Bush announced new sanctions against Iran.

"If for some reasons they continue down their course of folly toward nuclear ambition, then I would take military action if that's available to us...That's an option that's on the table. And it's is not something which we'll spell out specifically. I really can't lay out exactly how that would be done, but we have a number of options from blockade to bombardment of some kind. And that's something we very much have to keep on the table, and we will ready ourselves to be able to take, because, frankly, I think it's unacceptable for Iran to have nuclear weapons," said Romney

Democrats, of course, are throwing a fit because there are true patriots who will stand against terrorism and Democrats can't stand the fact the people are realizing how unpatriotic they are. They would rather bow down to Iran and let them have nuclear weapons than stand up against a terrorist regime.

"The aggressive actions taken today by the administration absent any corresponding diplomatic action is exactly what we all should have known was coming when we considered our vote on the Kyl-Lieberman Amendment, and smacks, frankly, of a dangerous step toward armed confrontation with Iran," Presidential candidate Chris Dodd said about the Bush Administration's new sanctions on Iran. What I ask is how this idiot Dodd says that there is not "corresponding diplomatic action?" What we are doing now is diplomacy, Iran is just refusing to cooperate. But we have to remember, diplomacy to Democrats is just laying down and letter terrorists walk all over you.

The fact, is right now we are using diplomacy with the terrorist country of Iran and it is not working. Even France sees this. If Iran continues to not cooperate we would have to try something else and frankly, the only thing that works with animals like Ahmadinejad is to beat them into submission (military force). I hope and pray that this confrontation with Iran can be handled without the use of military force, but it doesn't look like Iran will cooperate. Romney has taken a tough stance against Iran and it looks like he will continue to do so. This is a good thing because he realizes the threat that Iran poses to the United States and it's allies and he's not going to let them run rampant. Thank-you for reading and God Bless.

Jews a "Pain in the Neck?"

Former President of Iran, Hashemi Rafsanjani, said today that the Jews in Germany during the Holocaust were persecuted because they were a "pain in the neck". He also said that the Jews caused problems in Germany because they "had a lot of property" and "controlled an empire of propaganda." Rafsanjani also said that what the Nazis did was successful in saving Europe from the evil of Zionism. Rafsanjani is an idiot.

These are the kind of people that are leading Iran right now, the current President of Iran, Mamoud Ahmadinejad, has also said that the country of Israel should be "wiped off the map." Because of people like these two animals we have to take an aggressive stance against the Iranian government and not engage in talks with Iran without precondition. Democrats, such as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, support talking with these terrorists without preconditions. These terrorist are killing American troops in Iraq and Democrats want to sit down and talk with them? We are long past diplomacy with theses people and it has nothing to do with their nuclear weapons ambitions (although that does add on to it), it's because there are committing acts of war against the United States every day and we can't do anything about because people like Clinton, Obama and the rest of the Democrats want to talk. These idiots make me sick. They want to reward Iran for killing American troops by talking to them without precondition. The only way that we should talk with them is when they are in American custody. Thank-you for reading and God Bless

Democrats Make War Harder for Troops?

Democrats in congress want to pass legislation claiming that the the killing of Armenians in WWI was a genocide. Turkey is threating not to let the U.S. use it's country as a main transportation area for much needed equipment for American troops in Iraq if this legislation is passed.

70 percent of all U.S. cargo going to Iraq goes through Turkey, 1/3 of all the fuel for the troops goes through Turkey and 95 percent of the new Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles goes through Turkey. This legislation would directly affect our military and make the objective in Iraq harder. Why democrats are so hell bent on America's defeat is unknown to me but it is very unpatriotic. Turkey has told us what they may do so Democrats wanting to pass this for political purposes is sick, selfish and not American. Republicans are not excluded from this, if they vote for this they, also, are responsible for undermining our troops.

We are in a time of war and we should not put our political strategies before our support for the troops that are protecting this country from terrorists around the world. What congress needs to do is starting supporting our troops and quit playing politics at the military's expense. Democrats say that the best way to support our troops is to get them out, but I guaranty you that if you talk to the troops an overwhelming majority will believe in the purpose in Iraq and want congress' support by providing them what they need to do the job. If Democrats really support the troops then they need to listen to them (and not just the few that want out). Thank-you for reading and God Bless.